Michael Eric Pierce v. Erin Marie Pierce

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 25, 2019·No. 17-1824·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D17-1824 _____________________________

MICHAEL ERIC PIERCE,

Appellant,

v.

ERIN MARIE PIERCE,

Appellee. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Calhoun County. Shonna Young Gay, Judge.

January 25, 2019

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Michael Eric Pierce, challenges the trial court’s Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage. We reject his claims except his argument that the trial court failed to make the requisite factual determinations justifying the amount of child support awarded, as well as any arrears. Accordingly, we reverse and remand so that the trial court can make the appropriate factual findings relating to the trial court’s calculation of the child support and arrears owed by Pierce. See Exter v. Diodonet- Molina, 152 So. 3d 699, 701 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014); Aguirre v. Aguirre, 985 So. 2d 1203, 1207 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

LEWIS, WETHERELL, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Michael Eric Pierce, pro se, Appellant.

Erin Marie Pierce, pro se, Appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Michael Eric Pierce v. Erin Marie Pierce, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Michael Eric Pierce v. Erin Marie Pierce (Michael Eric Pierce v. Erin Marie Pierce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Aguirre v. Aguirre
985 So. 2d 1203 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Exter v. Diodonet-Molina
152 So. 3d 699 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)