Michael Edward Harssema v. State
This text of Michael Edward Harssema v. State (Michael Edward Harssema v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered January 31, 2019
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00898-CR
MICHAEL EDWARD HARSSEMA, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 199-80837-2018
ORDER Before the Court is appellant’s January 25, 2019 motion to unseal a portion of the record.
The reporter’s record reflects this case was tried before the Honorable Barnett Walker, presiding
judge of County Court of Law No. 2. During the trial, the trial court reviewed and sealed
Court’s Exhibit No. 2—the report of a drug recognition expert who examined the complainant.
Appellant now seeks to unseal the report for the limited purpose of allowing counsel to review it
to determine whether the trial court erred in not deciding to test the complainant for drugs.
Court’s Exhibit No. 2 was not filed with the reporter’s record in this case. Court reporter Kristen
Kopp filed only a copy of what appears to be an envelope holding the report.
We ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine whether Court’s Exhibit
No. 2 should be unsealed for the limited purpose of allowing counsel for appellant and the State to review the results of the drug recognition expert’s examination. If the trial court determines
counsel should be allowed to review Court’s Exhibit No. 2, we further ORDER the trial court to
make such orders as are necessary to grant counsel for the parties access to the exhibit.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include
written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this
order.
We ORDER court reporter Kristen Kopp to file, within THIRTY DAYS of the date of
this order, a sealed supplemental reporter’s record containing a copy of Court’s Exhibit No. 2.
This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The
appeal shall be reinstated when the findings are received or at such other time as the Court deems
appropriate.
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to transmit a copy of this order, by electronic
transmission to the Honorable Angela Tucker, Presiding Judge, 199th Judicial District Court; to
Kristen Kopp, official court reporter, County Court of Law No. 2; and to counsel for the parties.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michael Edward Harssema v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-edward-harssema-v-state-texapp-2019.