Michael Easley v. City of Riverside

908 F.3d 1156
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Michael Easley v. City of Riverside. Read the opinion of the Court — 890 F.3d 851
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 15, 2018·No. 16-55941·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 15 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL EASLEY; STEPHANIA No. 16-55941 SESSION, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 5:14-cv-00117-TJH-SP Central District of California, v. Riverside

CITY OF RIVERSIDE; SERGIO DIAZ; ORDER SILVIO MACIAS; DOES, 1 to 10, inclusive,

Defendants-Appellees.

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in this case shall not be

cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges Watford and R. Nelson did not participate in the deliberations or vote

in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Michael Easley v. City of Riverside, 908 F.3d 1156 (9th Cir. 2018).

908 F.3d 1156 (Michael Easley v. City of Riverside) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.