Michael E. Lyons, Ind Denita L. Lyons, Ind. Michael E. Lyons and Denita L. Lyons, as Co-personal Rep. of the Estate of Megan Renee Lyons v. Richmond Community School Corp.Et Al.
This text of Michael E. Lyons, Ind Denita L. Lyons, Ind. Michael E. Lyons and Denita L. Lyons, as Co-personal Rep. of the Estate of Megan Renee Lyons v. Richmond Community School Corp.Et Al. (Michael E. Lyons, Ind Denita L. Lyons, Ind. Michael E. Lyons and Denita L. Lyons, as Co-personal Rep. of the Estate of Megan Renee Lyons v. Richmond Community School Corp.Et Al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION Jul 31 2013, 6:47 am
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS: ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES RICHMOND COMMUNITY SCHOOL GARY P. PRICE CORPORATION ET AL.: Indianapolis, Indiana RICK D. MEILS JOHN W. MERVILDE Meils Thompson Dietz & Berish Indianapolis, Indiana
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE INDIANA INSURANCE COMPANY:
JAMES S. STEPHENSON Stephenson Morow & Semler Indianapolis, Indiana
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
MICHAEL E. LYONS, Individually; ) DENITA L. LYONS, Individually; ) MICHAEL E. LYONS and DENITA L. ) LYONS, as Co-personal Representatives ) of the Estate of Megan Renee Lyons, Deceased, ) ) Appellants/Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) No. 89A04-1204-PL-159 ) RICHMOND COMMUNITY SCHOOL ) CORPORATION d/b/a RICHMOND ) HIGH SCHOOL; JOE SPICER; ) JEFFREY THORNE; and MAGGIE LaRUE, ) in their individual and official capacities, ) ) Appellees/Defendants, ) ) INDIANA INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) Appellee/Non-Party-Respondent. )
APPEAL FROM THE WAYNE SUPERIOR COURT The Honorable Peter D. Haviza, Special Judge Cause No. 89D01-1006-PL-11
July 31, 2013
OPINION ON REHEARING - FOR PUBLICATION
BRADFORD, Judge
Appellees/Defendants Richmond Community School Corporation and certain school
administrators (“RCSC”) petition this court for rehearing. We grant RCSC’s petition, in part,
for the limited purpose of concluding that, “[a]lthough there may be factual issues to be
determined, whether there has been compliance with the [Indiana Tort Claims] Act’s notice
requirement is a question of law for the court.” Gregor v. Szarmach, 706 N.E.2d 240, 241
(Ind. Ct. App. 1999); accord City of Indpls. v. Satz, 377 N.E.2d 623, 625 (1978). In our
original opinion, we stated that the issue should be presented to the jury.
On remand, the trial court that should determine whether, in the exercise of ordinary
diligence, Appellants/Plaintiffs Michael and Denita Lyons could have learned of RCSC’s
alleged “tortious acts” prior to July 15, 2009. Wehling v. Citizens Nat’l Bank, 586 N.E.2d 840,
843 (Ind. 1992). July 15, 2009, was 180 days before the Lyonses filed notice of their claims
on January 11, 2010. In all other respects, we reaffirm our original disposition.
2 ROBB, C.J., and BAKER, J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michael E. Lyons, Ind Denita L. Lyons, Ind. Michael E. Lyons and Denita L. Lyons, as Co-personal Rep. of the Estate of Megan Renee Lyons v. Richmond Community School Corp.Et Al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-e-lyons-ind-denita-l-lyons-ind-michael-e-lyons-and-denita-l-indctapp-2013.