Michael Doud Gill v. M. E. Miller

Fifth Circuit

Michael Doud Gill v. M. E. Miller

393 F.2d 22, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7663

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMarch 18, 1968

Docket24876

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 393 F.2d 22 (Michael Doud Gill v. M. E. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Michael Doud Gill v. M. E. Miller, 393 F.2d 22, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7663 (5th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Concluding, as we do, that the trial court had a broad discretion in determining whether to grant or withhold immunity to a non-resident from being served with process while a subpoenaed witness at a hearing in the Southern District of Florida, Lamb v. Schmitt, 285 U.S. 222, 52 S.Ct. 317, 76 L.Ed. 720 (1932); Page Co. v. MacDonald, 261 U.S. 446, 43 S.Ct. 416, 67 L.Ed. 737; Stewart v. Ramsay, 242 U.S. 128, 34 S.Ct. 44, 61 L.Ed. 192, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Concluding, as we do, that the trial court had a broad discretion in determining whether to grant or withhold immunity to a non-resident from being served with process while a subpoenaed witness at a hearing in the Southern District of Florida, Lamb v. Schmitt, 285 U.S. 222, 52 S.Ct. 317, 76 L.Ed. 720 (1932); Page Co. v. MacDonald, 261 U.S. 446, 43 S.Ct. 416, 67 L.Ed. 737; Stewart v. Ramsay, 242 U.S. 128, 34 S.Ct. 44, 61 L.Ed. 192, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

393 F.2d 22, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-doud-gill-v-m-e-miller-ca5-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack