Michael Dillon Farias and Miguel Angel Farias v. Ricardo Arellano, Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of Red Ram Oilfield Services, LLC

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 29, 2023
Docket13-23-00212-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Michael Dillon Farias and Miguel Angel Farias v. Ricardo Arellano, Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of Red Ram Oilfield Services, LLC (Michael Dillon Farias and Miguel Angel Farias v. Ricardo Arellano, Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of Red Ram Oilfield Services, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michael Dillon Farias and Miguel Angel Farias v. Ricardo Arellano, Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of Red Ram Oilfield Services, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-23-00212-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

MICHAEL DILLON FARIAS AND MIGUEL ANGEL FARIAS, Appellants,

v.

RICARDO ARELLANO, INDIVIDUALLY AND DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF RED RAM OILFIELD SERVICES, LLC, Appellees. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 93rd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Tijerina, Silva, and Peña Memorandum Opinion by Justice Silva This matter is before the Court on appellants’ unopposed amended motion to

dismiss the appeal. The parties, having resolved the matters in controversy, filed a notice

of settlement with the trial court. The Court, having considered the unopposed amended motion to dismiss the

appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2).

The unopposed amended motion to dismiss the appeal filed by the appellants is granted,

the appeal is hereby dismissed, and appellees previous opposition to appellants’

amended notice of appeal and motion to dismiss is hereby denied as moot.

Costs are taxed against appellants. See id. R. 42.1(d) (“Absent agreement of the

parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.”). Having dismissed the appeal at

the parties’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained.

CLARISSA SILVA Justice

Delivered and filed on the 29th day of June, 2023.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Michael Dillon Farias and Miguel Angel Farias v. Ricardo Arellano, Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of Red Ram Oilfield Services, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-dillon-farias-and-miguel-angel-farias-v-ricardo-arellano-texapp-2023.