Michael Deardorff, Kathy Deardorff and Betty Deardorff v. Lubbock National Bank

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 11, 2005
Docket07-04-00592-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Michael Deardorff, Kathy Deardorff and Betty Deardorff v. Lubbock National Bank (Michael Deardorff, Kathy Deardorff and Betty Deardorff v. Lubbock National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michael Deardorff, Kathy Deardorff and Betty Deardorff v. Lubbock National Bank, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

NO. 07-04-0592-CV


IN THE COURT OF APPEALS



FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



AT AMARILLO



PANEL D



FEBRUARY 11, 2005

______________________________



MICHAEL DEARDORFF, KATHY DEARDORFF AND BETTY J. DEARDORFF,



Appellants



V.



LUBBOCK NATIONAL BANK,



Appellee

_________________________________



FROM THE 99th DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;



NO. 2004-527,809; HON. MACKEY K. HANCOCK, PRESIDING

_______________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION



Before QUINN, REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

Appellants Michael Deardorff, Kathy Deardorff and Betty J. Deardorff (the Deardorffs) filed a notice of appeal on December 27, 2004. The clerk's and reporter's records were due on January 6, 2005. To date, no clerk's or reporter's records have been received. On January 31, 2005, the clerk filed a request for extension of time to file the record, stating that "appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the record." On January 31, 2005, the Deardorffs were directed by letter to provide this court with proof that they either paid for the record or made satisfactory arrangements for payment of the record on or before February 10, 2005. So too were they told that the failure to comply with the court's directive would result in dismissal. The deadline lapsed, and we received nothing from the Deardorffs illustrating that payment for the clerk's record has been made to or arrangements for its payment have been made with the clerk.

Because the Deardorffs failed to comply with our January 31st directive, we dismiss the appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(b) and (c).

Per Curiam

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Michael Deardorff, Kathy Deardorff and Betty Deardorff v. Lubbock National Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-deardorff-kathy-deardorff-and-betty-deardo-texapp-2005.