Michael Dean Davis v. the State of Texas
This text of Michael Dean Davis v. the State of Texas (Michael Dean Davis v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-22-00296-CR
MICHAEL DEAN DAVIS, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 2 Tarrant County, Texas1 Trial Court No. 1711862, Honorable Betty Arvin, Presiding
December 29, 2022 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before PARKER and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellant, Michael Dean Davis, appeals his conviction for driving while
intoxicated.2 The appellate record was originally due November 28, 2022. The clerk’s
record was filed by this deadline, but the reporter’s record was not. By letter of December
8, 2022, we notified the reporter that the record was overdue and directed her to advise
1Originally appealed to the Second Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalizations efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001. 2 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 49.04. this Court of the status of the record by December 19. To date, the reporter’s record has
not been filed and the reporter has had no further communication with this Court.
Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further
proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c) (“The trial and appellate courts are jointly
responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed.”); 37.3(a)(2) (requiring
appellate courts to “make whatever order is appropriate to avoid further delay and to
preserve the parties’ rights” when the appellate record is not timely filed). On remand,
the trial court shall determine the following:
(1) what tasks remain to complete the filing of the reporter’s record;
(2) why the reporter has not completed the necessary tasks;
(3) what amount of time is reasonably necessary for the completion of those
tasks; and
(4) whether the reporter can complete the tasks within the time the trial court
finds reasonable.
Should the trial court determine that the reporter will require more than thirty days
to complete, certify, and file the reporter’s record, it shall arrange for a substitute reporter
to do so. The trial court is directed to enter such orders necessary to address the
aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a
supplemental clerk’s record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by January
30, 2023.
Should the reporter file the record on or before January 12, 2023, she is directed
to immediately notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon the trial court shall
not be required to take any further action.
2 It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michael Dean Davis v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-dean-davis-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.