Michael Dayao, an Infant, by His Mother and Next Friend, Norma Dayao v. Joe F. Staley, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service

Fifth Circuit

Michael Dayao, an Infant, by His Mother and Next Friend, Norma Dayao v. Joe F. Staley, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service

424 F.2d 1131, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9764

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 15, 1970

Docket28647

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 424 F.2d 1131 (Michael Dayao, an Infant, by His Mother and Next Friend, Norma Dayao v. Joe F. Staley, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Michael Dayao, an Infant, by His Mother and Next Friend, Norma Dayao v. Joe F. Staley, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, 424 F.2d 1131, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9764 (5th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Our decision in this case is controlled by the recent decision of this court in Perdido v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 420 F.2d 1179 (5th Cir. 1969), in which the same issues were raised. 1

Affirmed.

1

. Pursuant to Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the ease on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Huth v. Southern Pacific Company, 5 Cir. 1969, 417 F.2d 526, Part I; and Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Our decision in this case is controlled by the recent decision of this court in Perdido v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 420 F.2d 1179 (5th Cir. 1969), in which the same issues were raised. 1

Affirmed.

1

. Pursuant to Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the ease on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Huth v. Southern Pacific Company, 5 Cir. 1969, 417 F.2d 526, Part I; and Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

424 F.2d 1131, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-dayao-an-infant-by-his-mother-and-next-friend-norma-dayao-v-joe-ca5-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack