Michael David Atkinson v. Yun Atkinson and Estar Realty
This text of Michael David Atkinson v. Yun Atkinson and Estar Realty (Michael David Atkinson v. Yun Atkinson and Estar Realty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued February 27, 2024
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00918-CV ——————————— MICHAEL DAVID ATKINSON, Appellant V. YUN ATKINSON AND ESTAR REALTY, LLC, Appellees
On Appeal from the 400th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 22-DCV-295417
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On December 8, 2023, appellant, Michael David Atkinson, filed a notice of
appeal, stating that he “inten[ded] to appeal the trial court’s judgment rendered on”
August 3, 2023. Appellant has neither paid the required fees nor established
indigence for purposes of costs. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145; TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.851(b), 51.941(a); Order, Fees
Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before
the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug.
28, 2015). On January 5, 2024, appellant was notified that this appeal was subject
to dismissal if appellate costs were not paid, or indigence was not established, by
February 5, 2024. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). Appellant did not adequately
respond to the Court’s notice.
Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for the
preparation of the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). On January 8, 2024,
appellant was notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal if appellant did not
submit written evidence that he had paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for the
preparation of the clerk’s record by February 7, 2024. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b),
(c). Appellant did not adequately respond to the Court’s notice.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and
want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c), 43.2(f). We dismiss any
pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Guerra and Farris.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michael David Atkinson v. Yun Atkinson and Estar Realty, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-david-atkinson-v-yun-atkinson-and-estar-realty-texapp-2024.