Michael D. Wells Paula Wells v. General Electric Company, a Corporation, & Third Party v. Montel Metals Incorporated, Third Party
Opinion
Michael D. WELLS; Paula Wells, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, a Corporation, Defendant & Third
Party Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
MONTEL METALS INCORPORATED, Third Party Defendant.
No. 93-1029.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Argued Sept. 29, 1993.
Decided Nov. 30, 1993.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore; Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-91-3389-S). Affirmed by published per curiam opinion.
William Charles Moyer, Lorch & Naville, New Albany, IN, argued (John J. Pyne, Pyne & Derry, P.C., Chevy Chase, MD, on brief), for plaintiffs-appellants.
Kent A. Gardiner, argued (Jonathan H. Pittman, on brief), Crowell & Moring, Washington, DC, for plaintiff-appellee.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Having considered the record in this case and the briefs, and after oral argument, we are of the opinion that the decision of the district court should be affirmed.
Accordingly, we affirm, adopting the opinion of the district court, Wells v. General Elec. Co., 807 F.Supp. 1202 (D.Md.1992).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
9 F.3d 1112 (Michael D. Wells Paula Wells v. General Electric Company, a Corporation, & Third Party v. Montel Metals Incorporated, Third Party) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.