Michael Cutts v. Richland Holdings, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Michael Cutts v. Richland Holdings, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 953 F.3d 554
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 11, 2020·No. 18-15377·Unpublished

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAR 11 2020

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL CUTTS, No. 18-15377

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No.

2:17-cv-01525-JCM-PAL

v.

RICHLAND HOLDINGS, INC., DBA Acctcorp of Southern Nevada; CLIFFORD ORDER* MOLIN, DBA Zeeba Sleep Center,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted June 14, 2019 Submission Withdrawn July 22, 2019 Resubmitted March 11, 2020 San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD and IKUTA, Circuit Judges, and PEARSON,** District Judge.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

**

The Honorable Benita Y. Pearson, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

The stay of these proceedings is lifted. This case is hereby resubmitted as of

the date of this order.

This appeal is hereby dismissed pursuant to the parties’ joint stipulation to

voluntarily dismiss this appeal pursuant to Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of

Appellate Procedure (Dkt. 53). The parties have agreed that each side shall bear its

own costs on appeal. The filing of this order shall serve as the court’s mandate.

The Clerk is hereby directed to serve a copy of this order on the Nevada

Supreme Court.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Michael Cutts v. Richland Holdings, Inc., (9th Cir. 2020).

Michael Cutts v. Richland Holdings, Inc. (Michael Cutts v. Richland Holdings, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.