Michael Clifford Singleton v. the State of Texas
This text of Michael Clifford Singleton v. the State of Texas (Michael Clifford Singleton v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________
No. 02-25-00160-CR ___________________________
MICHAEL CLIFFORD SINGLETON, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS
On Appeal from County Criminal Court No. 10 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1831930
Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Birdwell, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief justice Sudderth MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Michael Clifford Singleton attempts to appeal from an order granting
his plea in bar, i.e., an order that bars his prosecution for the underlying misdemeanor
offense. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 12.45 (barring prosecution of offense when
defendant—with the State’s agreement—admits guilt and requests that court consider
his guilt in assessing his sentence for another offense); Hilburn v. State, 946 S.W.2d
885, 886 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1997, no pet.) (per curiam) (explaining that, “[i]f an
unadjudicated offense is admitted before the trial court, and the court agrees to a
defendant’s request to take that offense into account when assessing punishment for
some other offense(s), [then] the defendant is granted a plea in bar, and there can be
no prosecution for the unadjudicated offense”). But “we do not have jurisdiction to
hear a purported appeal from a judgment granting a plea in bar.” Hilburn, 946 S.W.2d
at 886; see Graham-O’Dell v. State, No. 02-23-00264-CR, 2023 WL 7210161, at *1 (Tex.
App.—Fort Worth Nov. 2, 2023, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication);
Courtney v. State, Nos. 02-22-00161-CR, 02-22-00162-CR, 2022 WL 17494604, at *1
(Tex. App.—Fort Worth Dec. 8, 2022, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op., not
designated for publication).
Given this jurisdictional flaw, we sent Singleton a letter warning that we could
dismiss his appeal unless, within ten days, he showed grounds for continuing it. See
Tex. R. App. P. 44.3. More than ten days have passed, and we have not received a
response.
2 Therefore, we dismiss Singleton’s appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R.
App. P. 43.2(f); Graham-O’Dell, 2023 WL 7210161, at *1; Courtney, 2022 WL 17494604,
at *1; Hilburn, 946 S.W.2d at 886.
/s/ Bonnie Sudderth
Bonnie Sudderth Chief Justice
Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
Delivered: June 26, 2025
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michael Clifford Singleton v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-clifford-singleton-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.