Michael Charles Ward v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 9, 2022
DocketA22A1446
StatusPublished

This text of Michael Charles Ward v. State (Michael Charles Ward v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michael Charles Ward v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ June 09, 2022

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22A1446. MICHAEL CHARLES WARD v. THE STATE.

A jury convicted Michael Charles Ward of possession of tools in the commission of a crime and he was sentenced in August 2009 to five years probation. In September 2021, Ward filed a motion for an out-of-time appeal, which the trial court denied on December 20, 2021. On January 28, 2022, Ward filed a motion for reconsideration, which the court denied on February 15, 2022. On March 17, 2022, Ward filed a notice of appeal seeking review of the February 15 order. We, however, lack jurisdiction. A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). “The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction upon an appellate court.” Perlman v. Perlman, 318 Ga. App. 731, 739 (4) (734 SE2d 560) (2012) (punctuation omitted). Further, the filing of a motion for reconsideration does not extend the time for filing a notice of appeal, and the denial of a motion for reconsideration is not itself a directly appealable judgment. See State v. White, 282 Ga. 859, 860 (1) (655 SE2d 575) (2008); Bell v. Cohran, 244 Ga. App. 510, 511 (536 SE2d 187) (2000). Ward filed his notice of appeal 87 days after the December 20, 2021 order denying his motion for an out-of-time appeal. Thus, the notice is untimely as to that order.1 And Ward’s notice of appeal is invalid as to the February 15 order denying his motion for

1 We also note that the Georgia Supreme Court recently determined that a trial court lacks authority to grant an out-of-time appeal. Cook v. State, ___ Ga. ___ (5) (870 SE2d 758, 782-783) (2022). reconsideration. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 06/09/2022 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. White
655 S.E.2d 575 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2008)
Bell v. Cohran
536 S.E.2d 187 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2000)
Perlman v. Perlman
734 S.E.2d 560 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012)
Cook v. State
870 S.E.2d 758 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Michael Charles Ward v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-charles-ward-v-state-gactapp-2022.