Michael Charles Chadman v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 7, 2018·No. 02-18-00017-CR·Published

Opinion

FILE COPY

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth No. 02-18-00016-CR No. 02-18-00017-CR

MICHAEL CHARLES CHADMAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the 415th District Court Parker County, Texas Trial Court No. CR17-0425, CR17-0427

ORDER

Appellant’s counsel has filed a supplemental Anders brief with this court after

reviewing the supplemented record. And the trial court clerk has informed this court

that a copy of the supplemental parts of the appellate record has been sent directly to

appellant pro se. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 321 & n.24 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

Accordingly, appellant’s pro se response to the Anders brief and supplemental

Anders brief are due Monday, January 7, 2019. If appellant does not file a pro se FILE COPY

response on or before Monday, January 7, 2019, this court will assume that appellant

does not intend to file a response, and the State will have thirty days to respond. The

court will consider the appeal after the State files its brief, if any.

We direct the clerk of this court to transmit a copy of this order to the

attorneys of record, appellant, the trial court clerk, and the court reporter.

Dated November 7, 2018.

Per Curiam

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Michael Charles Chadman v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Michael Charles Chadman v. State (Michael Charles Chadman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kelly, Sylvester
436 S.W.3d 313 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)