Michael Carl Davis v. State
Opinion
APPELLANT
APPELLEE
PER CURIAM
Michael Carl Davis seeks to appeal from a judgment of conviction for robbery. The punishment, enhanced by a previous felony conviction, is imprisonment for sixteen years.
Sentence was imposed in this cause on June 24, 1994. No motion for new trial was filed. Notice of appeal was filed on September 14, 1994, long after it was due. Tex. R. App. P. 41(b)(1). No extension of time for filing notice of appeal was requested. Tex. R. App. P. 41(b)(2). There is nothing in the record to indicate that notice of appeal was properly mailed to the district clerk within the time prescribed by rule 41(b)(1). Tex. R. App. P. 4(b). It appears that notice of appeal was filed after this Court notified counsel that a notice of appeal did not appear in the transcript.
Without a timely filed notice of appeal, this Court is without jurisdiction. Rodarte v. State, 860 S.W.2d 108 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993); Shute v. State, 744 S.W.2d 96 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). The appeal is dismissed.
Before Justices Powers, Aboussie and B. A. Smith
Appeal Dismissed
Filed: September 28, 1994
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Michael Carl Davis v. State (Michael Carl Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.