Michael C. Antonelli v. Edward F. Reilley, Chairman, United States Parole Commission

Fourth Circuit

Michael C. Antonelli v. Edward F. Reilley, Chairman, United States Parole Commission

59 F.3d 165, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23216, 1995 WL 378465

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 27, 1995

Docket95-6378

StatusPublished

This text of 59 F.3d 165 (Michael C. Antonelli v. Edward F. Reilley, Chairman, United States Parole Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Michael C. Antonelli v. Edward F. Reilley, Chairman, United States Parole Commission, 59 F.3d 165, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23216, 1995 WL 378465 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

59 F.3d 165
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Michael C. ANTONELLI, Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
EDWARD F. REILLEY, Chairman, United States Parole
Commission, Respondent--Appellee.

No. 95-6378.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 18, 1995.
Decided June 27, 1995.

Michael C. Antonelli, Appellant Pro Se.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying his mandamus petition in which he requested the district court to order his release from custody because parole commission officials failed to comply with parole regulations, and denying reconsideration of this order. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Antonelli v. Reilley, No. CA-94-2572 (D. Md. Sept. 30, 1994 and Feb. 22, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

59 F.3d 165
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Michael C. ANTONELLI, Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
EDWARD F. REILLEY, Chairman, United States Parole
Commission, Respondent--Appellee.

No. 95-6378.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 18, 1995.
Decided June 27, 1995.

Michael C. Antonelli, Appellant Pro Se.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying his mandamus petition in which he requested the district court to order his release from custody because parole commission officials failed to comply with parole regulations, and denying reconsideration of this order. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Antonelli v. Reilley, No. CA-94-2572 (D. Md. Sept. 30, 1994 and Feb. 22, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 F.3d 165, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23216, 1995 WL 378465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-c-antonelli-v-edward-f-reilley-chairman-un-ca4-1995.