Michael Bynane v. David Guzman
This text of Michael Bynane v. David Guzman (Michael Bynane v. David Guzman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION
Cause number: 01-16-00356-CV Style: Michael Bynane v. David Guzman Date motion filed*: May 17, 2016 Type of motions: Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Appellant Michael Bynane Parties filing motions: Appellant’s Counsel Jeffrey C. Jackson and John P. Fretz Document to be filed: N/A
Is appeal accelerated? No.
Ordered that motion is:
Granted If document is to be filed, document due: N/A Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________ Appellant’s counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted because it complies with Rule 6.5 and was served on appellant over 10 days ago with no response filed in this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(a), (b), 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a). Accordingly, the Clerk of this Court is directed to remove Jeffrey C. Jackson and John P. Fretz as counsel for appellant. Mr. Jackson is ordered to comply with his notification obligations to appellant under Rule 6.5(c) by filing a notice with the Clerk of this Court within ten days of this order. See id. 6.5(c), 34.6(b)(1), 35.3(b)(2)–(3), 38.6(a).
Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes Acting individually
Date: June 2, 2016
November 7, 2008 Revision
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michael Bynane v. David Guzman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-bynane-v-david-guzman-texapp-2016.