Michael Bynane v. David Guzman

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 2, 2016·No. 01-16-00356-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-16-00356-CV Style: Michael Bynane v. David Guzman Date motion filed*: May 17, 2016 Type of motions: Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Appellant Michael Bynane Parties filing motions: Appellant’s Counsel Jeffrey C. Jackson and John P. Fretz Document to be filed: N/A

Is appeal accelerated? No.

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due: N/A  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Appellant’s counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted because it complies with Rule 6.5 and was served on appellant over 10 days ago with no response filed in this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(a), (b), 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a). Accordingly, the Clerk of this Court is directed to remove Jeffrey C. Jackson and John P. Fretz as counsel for appellant. Mr. Jackson is ordered to comply with his notification obligations to appellant under Rule 6.5(c) by filing a notice with the Clerk of this Court within ten days of this order. See id. 6.5(c), 34.6(b)(1), 35.3(b)(2)–(3), 38.6(a).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes  Acting individually

Date: June 2, 2016

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Michael Bynane v. David Guzman, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Michael Bynane v. David Guzman (Michael Bynane v. David Guzman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.