Michael Bynane v. David Guzman

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 2, 2016
Docket01-16-00356-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Michael Bynane v. David Guzman (Michael Bynane v. David Guzman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michael Bynane v. David Guzman, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-16-00356-CV Style: Michael Bynane v. David Guzman Date motion filed*: May 17, 2016 Type of motions: Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Appellant Michael Bynane Parties filing motions: Appellant’s Counsel Jeffrey C. Jackson and John P. Fretz Document to be filed: N/A

Is appeal accelerated? No.

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due: N/A  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Appellant’s counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted because it complies with Rule 6.5 and was served on appellant over 10 days ago with no response filed in this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(a), (b), 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a). Accordingly, the Clerk of this Court is directed to remove Jeffrey C. Jackson and John P. Fretz as counsel for appellant. Mr. Jackson is ordered to comply with his notification obligations to appellant under Rule 6.5(c) by filing a notice with the Clerk of this Court within ten days of this order. See id. 6.5(c), 34.6(b)(1), 35.3(b)(2)–(3), 38.6(a).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes  Acting individually

Date: June 2, 2016

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Michael Bynane v. David Guzman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-bynane-v-david-guzman-texapp-2016.