Michael Brown v. Corporation Service Company Dba CSC-Lawyers Incorporating Services Company Dba Oak Springs Apartments

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 16, 2025
Docket04-25-00245-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Michael Brown v. Corporation Service Company Dba CSC-Lawyers Incorporating Services Company Dba Oak Springs Apartments (Michael Brown v. Corporation Service Company Dba CSC-Lawyers Incorporating Services Company Dba Oak Springs Apartments) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michael Brown v. Corporation Service Company Dba CSC-Lawyers Incorporating Services Company Dba Oak Springs Apartments, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-25-00245-CV

Michael BROWN, Appellant

v.

CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY dba CSC-Lawyers Incorporating Services Company dba Oak Springs Apartments, Appellee

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2022CI08686 Honorable Cynthia Marie Chapa, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice Lori Massey Brissette, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 16, 2025

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

On May 28, 2025, the trial court clerk filed a notification of late record stating the clerk’s

record had not been filed because appellant failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s

fee for preparing the record and that appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee. On

May 29, 2025, we ordered appellant to provide written proof to this court, on or before June 12,

2025, that either (1) the clerk’s fee had been paid or arrangements had been made to pay the clerk’s 04-25-00245-CV

fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. Our order warned that if

appellant failed to respond within the time provided, this appeal would be dismissed for want of

prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), 42.3(c).

To date, appellant has not responded to this court’s order. Accordingly, this appeal is

dismissed for want of prosecution. See id.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Michael Brown v. Corporation Service Company Dba CSC-Lawyers Incorporating Services Company Dba Oak Springs Apartments, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-brown-v-corporation-service-company-dba-csc-lawyers-incorporating-texapp-2025.