Michael Boyington v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Michael Boyington v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 28, 2022·No. 22-1497·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D22-1497 _____________________________

MICHAEL BOYINGTON,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. _____________________________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.

September 28, 2022

PER CURIAM.

Because the trial court has ruled on the pleading pending below, the Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Ward v. State, 770 So. 2d 206 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (dismissing a petition for writ of mandamus as moot where the trial court had ruled on the pleading pending below).

LEWIS, MAKAR, and JAY, JJ., concur. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Michael Boyington, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI