Michael Bloodworth v. Marcele Borges

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Michael Bloodworth v. Marcele Borges

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 21, 2016

Docket15-2146

StatusPublished

This text of Michael Bloodworth v. Marcele Borges (Michael Bloodworth v. Marcele Borges) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Michael Bloodworth v. Marcele Borges, (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

MICHAEL BLOODWORTH, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D15-2146

MARCELE BORGES,

Appellee.

_____________________________/

Opinion filed August 4, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County. David Rimmer, Judge.

Michael Bloodworth, pro se, Appellant.

E. Jane Brehany, Pensacola, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., WOLF and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI