Michael Blodgett v. Jon Hanson

555 F. App'x 639
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMay 23, 2014
Docket13-2197
StatusUnpublished

This text of 555 F. App'x 639 (Michael Blodgett v. Jon Hanson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michael Blodgett v. Jon Hanson, 555 F. App'x 639 (8th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Michael W. Blodgett appeals from an order of the District Court 1 dismissing his Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Acts suit under Rule 12(b)(6) of the *640 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Upon careful de novo review, we find that the Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal was proper, see Dubinsky v. Mermart, LLC, 595 F.3d 812, 815-16 (8th Cir.2010); that there was no abuse of discretion in the denial of reconsideration, see United States v. Metro. St. Louis Sewer Dist., 440 F.3d 930, 933 (8th Cir.2006); and that there was no abuse of discretion in the imposition of sanctions, either under the District Court’s inherent authority, see Bass v. Gen. Motors Corp., 150 F.3d 842, 851 (8th Cir.1998), or under Rule 11, see Clark v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 460 F.3d 1004, 1008 (8th Cir.2006), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1340, 127 S.Ct. 2043, 167 L.Ed.2d 767 (2007). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the District Court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jeanne J. Graham, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
555 F. App'x 639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-blodgett-v-jon-hanson-ca8-2014.