Michael Berry v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 2, 2002·No. 03-02-00573-CR·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN



NO. 03-02-00573-CR
Michael Louis Berry, Appellant


v.



The State of Texas, Appellee



FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY, 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. CR-01-462, HONORABLE CHARLES RAMSAY, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant's appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw. This Court may not grant the motion because the effect would be to leave the indigent appellant without counsel. Therefore, the motion is dismissed and counsel is instructed to refile her motion in the district court. That court may grant or deny the motion at its discretion. If counsel is permitted to withdraw, the court shall immediately appoint substitute counsel and advise this Court of its action.

It is ordered October 2, 2002.



Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Yeakel

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Michael Berry v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Michael Berry v. State (Michael Berry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.