Michael Berkowitz Co. v. United States

44 Cust. Ct. 585
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedFebruary 29, 1960
DocketReap. Dec. 9613; Entry No. 1006637
StatusPublished

This text of 44 Cust. Ct. 585 (Michael Berkowitz Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michael Berkowitz Co. v. United States, 44 Cust. Ct. 585 (cusc 1960).

Opinion

Ford, Judge:

The proper value for dutiable purposes of certain pure silk shantung warp dyed, 16 momme, 40 inches in width, rolled on carton tubes, and manufactured in and exported from Japan to the United States, is before the court for determination.

The parties hereto have entered into a stipulation wherein it has been agreed that the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Japan in the usual-wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and that all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was 92% cents per yard, net packed.

It was further stipulated and agreed that there was no higher foreign value for said merchandise at the day of exportation.

Upon the record before me, I find and hold that the export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as [586]*586amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (70 Stat. 943,. T.D. 54165), as supplemented by the final list published by the Secretary of the Treasury, 93 Treas. Dec. 14, T.D. 54521, is the proper basis for determining the value of the silk shantung in controversy and that such value is 92y2 cents per yard, net packed.

As to all other merchandise, the appeal is dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 Cust. Ct. 585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-berkowitz-co-v-united-states-cusc-1960.