Michael Ardis v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 14, 2022
Docket05-21-00875-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Michael Ardis v. the State of Texas (Michael Ardis v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michael Ardis v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Order entered March 14, 2022

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-21-00875-CR

MICHAEL ARDIS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F21-10832-R

ORDER

When appellant’s brief, originally due on December 23, 2021, was not filed,

we notified him by postcard and directed him to file his brief within ten days. On

January 11, 2022, appellant filed an extension motion which we granted making

his brief due on February 25, 2022. To date, no brief has been filed and we have

had no communication from appellant regarding this appeal.

We ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why

appellant’s brief has not been filed. The trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute this

appeal, whether appellant has abandoned the appeal, or whether appointed counsel

has abandoned the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot

obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing

in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.–Corpus

Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is

ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective

representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which

shall include written findings and recommendations, to this Court within

TWENTY DAYS of the date of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable

Jennifer Bennett, Presiding Judge, 265th Judicial District Court; to Lamonica

Littles, court coordinator, 265th Judicial District Court; to Christina O’Neil, Chief

Judicial Staff Counsel; and to counsel for all parties.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above

order. The appeal shall be reinstated twenty days from the date of this order or

when the Court finds it appropriate to do so.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meza v. State
742 S.W.2d 708 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Michael Ardis v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-ardis-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.