Michael Aragon v. State
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION Nos. 04-11-00128-CR, 04-11-00129-CR, 04-11-00130-CR & 04-11-00131-CR
Michael ARAGON, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court Nos. 2009CR0782, 2009CR4070, 2010CR8602 & 2010CR9414W Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice
Delivered and Filed: March 30, 2011
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
The trial court imposed sentence in each of the underlying causes on January 3, 2011.
Because appellant did not file a motion for new trial, the notice of appeal was due to be filed
February 2, 2011. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). A motion for extension of time to file the notice of
appeal was due on February 17, 2011. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Appellant filed a notice of appeal
on February 14, 2011, which was post-marked on February 11, 2011; however, appellant did not
file a motion for extension of time. 04-11-00128-CR, 04-11-00129-CR, 04-11-00130-CR, & 04-11-00131-CR
A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction. See
Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). A late notice of appeal may be
considered timely so as to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction if (1) it is filed within fifteen
days of the last day allowed for filing, (2) a motion for extension of time is filed in the court of
appeals within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal, and (3) the
court of appeals grants the motion for extension of time. See id. Because it appeared that the
notice of appeal was untimely filed in each of these appeals, this court ordered appellant to show
cause in writing by March 15, 2011, why these appeals should not be dismissed for lack of
jurisdiction. See id.; see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim. App.
1991) (out-of-time appeal from final felony conviction may be sought by filing a writ of habeas
corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure). Appellant did not
respond to this court’s order. The appeals are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Michael Aragon v. State (Michael Aragon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.