Michael Anthony Glover v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 1, 2025
DocketA25D0442
StatusPublished

This text of Michael Anthony Glover v. State (Michael Anthony Glover v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michael Anthony Glover v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ July 01, 2025

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A25D0442. MICHAEL ANTHONY GLOVER v. THE STATE.

Michael Anthony Glover was convicted in 2017 of rape and aggravated sodomy, and we affirmed his convictions on appeal. Glover v. State, Case No. A24A0146 (Apr. 19, 2024) (unpublished). In April 2025, Glover filed a “motion in arrest of judgment,” arguing that his indictment was defective and void. The trial court dismissed the motion, and Glover filed this application for discretionary appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction. To the extent Glover’s claims concerning the sufficiency of his indictment can be construed as a motion in arrest of judgment, the motion was untimely because it was not filed during the term of court at which the judgment was obtained.1 See OCGA § 17-9-61 (b); Hammond v. State, 292 Ga. 237, 238 (734 SE2d 396) (2012). Moreover, “a petition to vacate or modify a judgment of conviction is not an appropriate remedy in a criminal case.” Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 218 (1) (686 SE2d 786) (2009); see also Jones v. State, 290 Ga. App. 490, 493-494 (1) & (2) (659 SE2d 875) (2008) (challenge to validity of indictment is challenge to conviction). Any appeal from an order denying or dismissing such a motion must be dismissed. See Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532, 532 (690 SE2d 150) (2010); Harper, 286 Ga. at 218 (2).

1 See OCGA § 15-6-3 (23) (A) (noting that Bibb County terms of court begin the first Monday in February, April, June, August, October, and December). For these reasons, this application is hereby DISMISSED. Glover’s motion for an extension of time to file an application for discretionary review is DENIED AS MOOT.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 07/01/2025 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harper v. State
686 S.E.2d 786 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2009)
Jones v. State
659 S.E.2d 875 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2008)
Roberts v. State
690 S.E.2d 150 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2010)
Hammond v. State
734 S.E.2d 396 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Michael Anthony Glover v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-anthony-glover-v-state-gactapp-2025.