Michael Anthony De Los Santos v. Mary Gibson AKA Mary Molina
Opinion
NUMBER 13-10-00198-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
MICHAEL ANTHONY DE LOS SANTOS, Appellant,
v.
MARY GIBSON AKA MARY MOLINA, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 117th District Court of Nueces County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Garza Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on June 25, 2010. On July 20,
2010, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely filed and
that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of
Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of the
Court’s letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response
has been received from appellant.
Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain his failure to file a brief, file a
motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file his brief. Accordingly, the appeal is
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 31st day of August, 2010.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Michael Anthony De Los Santos v. Mary Gibson AKA Mary Molina (Michael Anthony De Los Santos v. Mary Gibson AKA Mary Molina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.