Michael Anthony Carter v. Candace Denise Moore and Ken Paxton, Attorney General of the State of Texas
This text of Michael Anthony Carter v. Candace Denise Moore and Ken Paxton, Attorney General of the State of Texas (Michael Anthony Carter v. Candace Denise Moore and Ken Paxton, Attorney General of the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
§ MICHAEL ANTHONY CARTER, No. 08-16-00014-CV § Appellant, Appeal from § v. 353rd District Court § CANDACE DENISE MOORE of Travis County, Texas AND KEN PAXTON, ATTORNEY § GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, (TC # D-1-FM-15-001246) § Appellees. §
JUDGMENT
The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be
dismissed for want of prosecution, in accordance with the opinion of this Court. We therefore
dismiss the appeal. We further order that because Appellant is indigent, no order regarding costs
is made. We further order that this decision be certified below for observance.
IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 17TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2016.
ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice
Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michael Anthony Carter v. Candace Denise Moore and Ken Paxton, Attorney General of the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-anthony-carter-v-candace-denise-moore-and-ken-paxton-attorney-texapp-2016.