Michael Anthony Bolden v. Edward W. Murray, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections

Fourth Circuit

Michael Anthony Bolden v. Edward W. Murray, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections

45 F.3d 425, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40367, 1994 WL 717617

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedDecember 29, 1994

Docket92-6115

StatusPublished

This text of 45 F.3d 425 (Michael Anthony Bolden v. Edward W. Murray, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Michael Anthony Bolden v. Edward W. Murray, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, 45 F.3d 425, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40367, 1994 WL 717617 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

45 F.3d 425
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Michael Anthony BOLDEN, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Director of the Virginia Department of
Corrections, Respondent Appellee.

No. 92-6115.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted January 10, 1994
Decided Dec. 29, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-91-99-N)

Michael Anthony Bolden, Appellant Pro Se.

Katherine P. Baldwin, Office of the Atty. Gen., of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Bolden v. Murray, No. CA-91-99-N (E.D. Va. Jan. 3, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

45 F.3d 425
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Michael Anthony BOLDEN, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Director of the Virginia Department of
Corrections, Respondent Appellee.

No. 92-6115.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted January 10, 1994
Decided Dec. 29, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-91-99-N)

Michael Anthony Bolden, Appellant Pro Se.

Katherine P. Baldwin, Office of the Atty. Gen., of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Bolden v. Murray, No. CA-91-99-N (E.D. Va. Jan. 3, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 F.3d 425, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40367, 1994 WL 717617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-anthony-bolden-v-edward-w-murray-director--ca4-1994.