Michael Allen Casel v. State
This text of Michael Allen Casel v. State (Michael Allen Casel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 07-12-00148-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL A
SEPTEMBER 20, 2012
CROWELL SNF, LLC D/B/A CROWELL NURSING CENTER, APPELLANT
v.
TERRI WALL, ELIZABETH KAY BAIZE, VICKIE TAMPLEN, DEBRA SANDERSON, AND KEITH MCDANIEL, ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF CHARLIE H. MCDANIEL, APPELLEES
FROM THE 46TH DISTRICT COURT OF FOARD COUNTY;
NO. 4675; HONORABLE DAN MIKE BIRD, JUDGE
Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Crowell SNF, LLC d/b/a Crowell Nursing Center, has filed an agreed
motion to dismiss this interlocutory appeal because appellees, Terri Wall, Elizabeth Kay
Baize, Vickie Tamplen, Debra Sanderson, and Keith McDaniel, on behalf of the Estate
of Charlie H. McDaniel, have dismissed their case against appellant. 1 The motion is
1 Crowell indicates in its motion that the trial court’s order of dismissal is attached to the motion as Exhibit A. However, the motion that was filed with this Court did not include any attachments. signed by attorneys for both parties. Without passing on the merits of the case, we
grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). There being
no agreement of the parties to the contrary, costs of the appeal are taxed against
appellant. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d).
Having dismissed the appeal at the parties' request, we will not entertain a
motion for rehearing and will issue our mandate forthwith.
Mackey K. Hancock Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michael Allen Casel v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-allen-casel-v-state-texapp-2012.