Michael Alan Sands v. State
This text of Michael Alan Sands v. State (Michael Alan Sands v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-17-00100-CR
MICHAEL ALAN SANDS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 354th District Court Hunt County, Texas Trial Court No. 31,416
Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ. ORDER Our review of the clerk’s and reporter’s records in this case indicates that they contain
“sensitive data” as that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a birth date, a home address, and the name
of any person who was a minor at the time the offense was committed.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a)(3).
The clerk’s record and volumes one, six, eight, nine, ten, eleven, twelve, thirteen, and fifteen of
the reporter’s record contain the name of a person who was a minor at the time the offense was
committed. Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing
with the court, including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” TEX.
R. APP. P. 9.10(b).1
Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper
form or electronic form, without redaction.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because the
clerk’s record and the reporter’s record contain sensitive data, we order the clerk of this Court or
her appointee, in accord with Rule 9.10(g), to seal the electronically filed clerk’s record and
volumes one, six, eight, nine, ten, eleven, twelve, thirteen, and fifteen of the electronically filed
reporter’s record in this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: April 5, 2018
1 Although the clerk’s record appears to include redactions, these redactions are ineffective. The redacted information can either be seen through the redaction, or the redacted information is easily discernable when that information is cut and pasted into a new document.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michael Alan Sands v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-alan-sands-v-state-texapp-2018.