Michael Akins Betty Akins v. Ronald J. Rodriguez, American Nuclear Insurers, Inc.

Ninth Circuit

Michael Akins Betty Akins v. Ronald J. Rodriguez, American Nuclear Insurers, Inc.

26 F.3d 105, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4165, 94 Daily Journal DAR 7752, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 13417, 1994 WL 241806

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJune 7, 1994

Docket90-16163

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 26 F.3d 105 (Michael Akins Betty Akins v. Ronald J. Rodriguez, American Nuclear Insurers, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Michael Akins Betty Akins v. Ronald J. Rodriguez, American Nuclear Insurers, Inc., 26 F.3d 105, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4165, 94 Daily Journal DAR 7752, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 13417, 1994 WL 241806 (9th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

On February 3, 1994, this court issued an opinion that affirmed the district court’s decision to abstain from hearing this case because of a pending state case. Akins v. Rodriguez, 15 F.3d 883 (9th Cir.1994). On February 25, 1994, we stayed the mandate pending a sua sponte call for en banc reconsideration to determine whether our opinion conflicts with Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., 12 F.3d 908 (9th Cir.1993).

On May 12, 1994, the parties filed a stipulation for dismissal of the entire action with prejudice. Accordingly, this ease is DISMISSED pursuant to the stipulation of the parties.

This court’s opinion filed on February 3, 1994, is VACATED and the case is REMANDED with instructions to the district court to VACATE its judgment. See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

On February 3, 1994, this court issued an opinion that affirmed the district court’s decision to abstain from hearing this case because of a pending state case. Akins v. Rodriguez, 15 F.3d 883 (9th Cir.1994). On February 25, 1994, we stayed the mandate pending a sua sponte call for en banc reconsideration to determine whether our opinion conflicts with Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., 12 F.3d 908 (9th Cir.1993).

On May 12, 1994, the parties filed a stipulation for dismissal of the entire action with prejudice. Accordingly, this ease is DISMISSED pursuant to the stipulation of the parties.

This court’s opinion filed on February 3, 1994, is VACATED and the case is REMANDED with instructions to the district court to VACATE its judgment. See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 F.3d 105, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4165, 94 Daily Journal DAR 7752, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 13417, 1994 WL 241806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-akins-betty-akins-v-ronald-j-rodriguez-american-nuclear-ca9-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack