Michael Aice v. Louisa D. Brown, Warden Parker Evatt, Commissioner T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina

45 F.3d 425, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 5825, 1995 WL 3689
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 4, 1995
Docket94-6580
StatusPublished

This text of 45 F.3d 425 (Michael Aice v. Louisa D. Brown, Warden Parker Evatt, Commissioner T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michael Aice v. Louisa D. Brown, Warden Parker Evatt, Commissioner T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, 45 F.3d 425, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 5825, 1995 WL 3689 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

45 F.3d 425
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Michael AICE, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
Louisa D. BROWN, Warden; Parker Evatt, Commissioner; T.
Travis Medlock, Attorney General of the State of
South Carolina, Respondents Appellees.

No. 94-6580.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 25, 1994.
Decided Jan. 4, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., District Judge. (CA-92-2262)

Michael Aice, appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., Columbia, SC, for appellees.

D.S.C.

DISMISSED.

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Aice v. Brown, No. CA-92-2262 (D.S.C. Apr. 15, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 F.3d 425, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 5825, 1995 WL 3689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-aice-v-louisa-d-brown-warden-parker-evatt--ca4-1995.