MICHAEL A. PEDONE  vs PALMINA PORTEREIKO

District Court of Appeal of Florida

MICHAEL A. PEDONE vs PALMINA PORTEREIKO

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 30, 2022

Docket22-0708

StatusPublished

This text of MICHAEL A. PEDONE vs PALMINA PORTEREIKO (MICHAEL A. PEDONE vs PALMINA PORTEREIKO) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MICHAEL A. PEDONE vs PALMINA PORTEREIKO, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

MICHAEL A. PEDONE,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D22-708 LT Case No. 2022-DR-223-AX

PALMINA PORTEREIKO,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed August 30, 2022

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hernando County, Don Barbee, Jr., Judge.

Michael A. Pedone, Brooksville, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.

2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the

appellate court cannot properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or

by an alternative theory.”).

LAMBERT, C.J., EVANDER and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI