MICHAEL A. PEDONE vs PALMINA PORTEREIKO

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 30, 2022·No. 22-0708·Published

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

MICHAEL A. PEDONE, Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D22-708 LT Case No. 2022-DR-223-AX

PALMINA PORTEREIKO, Appellee.

________________________________/ Opinion filed August 30, 2022

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hernando County, Don Barbee, Jr., Judge.

Michael A. Pedone, Brooksville, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.

2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court cannot properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to

conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”).

LAMBERT, C.J., EVANDER and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MICHAEL A. PEDONE vs PALMINA PORTEREIKO, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

MICHAEL A. PEDONE vs PALMINA PORTEREIKO (MICHAEL A. PEDONE vs PALMINA PORTEREIKO) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)