Michael A. Kennedy v. William M. House, Jr., Mark Cargill and John Doe, Named Unknown Attorney

Court of Appeals of Texas

Michael A. Kennedy v. William M. House, Jr., Mark Cargill and John Doe, Named Unknown Attorney

DecidedAugust 19, 2009

Docket12-09-00237-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Michael A. Kennedy v. William M. House, Jr., Mark Cargill and John Doe, Named Unknown Attorney (Michael A. Kennedy v. William M. House, Jr., Mark Cargill and John Doe, Named Unknown Attorney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Michael A. Kennedy v. William M. House, Jr., Mark Cargill and John Doe, Named Unknown Attorney, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

NO. 12-09-00237-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

MICHAEL A. KENNEDY, § APPEAL FROM THE 87TH APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

WILLIAM M. HOUSE, JR., MARK CARGILL AND JOHN DOE, NAMED UNKNOWN § ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS ATTORNEY, APPELLEES MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM On July 31, 2009, Appellant, Michael Kennedy, filed a notice of appeal. On that same date, this court notified Kennedy, pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 37.2 and 42.3, that the information received in this appeal does not contain a final judgment or other appealable order. Kennedy was further informed that the appeal would be dismissed if the information received in the appeal was not amended on or before August 10, 2009 to show the jurisdiction of this court. The deadline for amendment has passed, and Kennedy has neither responded to the July 31, 2009 notice or otherwise shown the jurisdiction of this court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX . R. APP. P. 37.1, 42.3. Opinion delivered August 19, 2009. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NO. 12-09-00237-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

MICHAEL A. KENNEDY, § APPEAL FROM THE 87TH APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

WILLIAM M. HOUSE, JR., MARK CARGILL AND JOHN DOE, NAMED UNKNOWN § ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS ATTORNEY, APPELLEES MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM On July 31, 2009, Appellant, Michael Kennedy, filed a notice of appeal. On that same date, this court notified Kennedy, pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 37.2 and 42.3, that the information received in this appeal does not contain a final judgment or other appealable order. Kennedy was further informed that the appeal would be dismissed if the information received in the appeal was not amended on or before August 10, 2009 to show the jurisdiction of this court. The deadline for amendment has passed, and Kennedy has neither responded to the July 31, 2009 notice or otherwise shown the jurisdiction of this court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX . R. APP. P. 37.1, 42.3. Opinion delivered August 19, 2009. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Michael A. Kennedy v. William M. House, Jr., Mark Cargill and John Doe, Named Unknown Attorney, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-a-kennedy-v-william-m-house-jr-mark-cargil-texapp-2009.