Michael A. Kennedy v. James T. Worthen, Brian Hoyle, Mark A. Calhoon, Allyson A. Mitchell, City of Palestine Police Department, Anderson County Sheriff Department, TDCJ-ID Director, Texas Court of Criminal Appeals and Brandi Ray, in Their Individual and Offical Capacity

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 14, 2018
Docket12-18-00020-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Michael A. Kennedy v. James T. Worthen, Brian Hoyle, Mark A. Calhoon, Allyson A. Mitchell, City of Palestine Police Department, Anderson County Sheriff Department, TDCJ-ID Director, Texas Court of Criminal Appeals and Brandi Ray, in Their Individual and Offical Capacity (Michael A. Kennedy v. James T. Worthen, Brian Hoyle, Mark A. Calhoon, Allyson A. Mitchell, City of Palestine Police Department, Anderson County Sheriff Department, TDCJ-ID Director, Texas Court of Criminal Appeals and Brandi Ray, in Their Individual and Offical Capacity) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michael A. Kennedy v. James T. Worthen, Brian Hoyle, Mark A. Calhoon, Allyson A. Mitchell, City of Palestine Police Department, Anderson County Sheriff Department, TDCJ-ID Director, Texas Court of Criminal Appeals and Brandi Ray, in Their Individual and Offical Capacity, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

NO. 12-18-00020-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

MICHAEL A. KENNEDY, § APPEAL FROM THE 3RD APPELLANT

V.

JAMES T. WORTHEN, BRIAN HOYLE, MARK A. CALHOON, ALLYSON A. MITCHELL, CITY OF § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PALESTINE POLICE DEPARTMENT, ANDERSON COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, TDCJ-ID DIRECTOR, TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AND BRANDI RAY, IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICAL CAPACITY, APPELLEES § ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM Appellant, Michael A. Kennedy, has filed a notice of appeal regarding the dismissal of a civil proceeding, cause number DCCV17-723-3, in Anderson County. Because Appellant has not complied, after notice, with either the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure or the requirements of Chapter 14 of the civil practice and remedies code, we dismiss the appeal. “A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs must pay--at the time an item is presented for filing--whatever fees are required by statute or Supreme Court order.” TEX. R. APP. P. 5. If unable to pay the requisite filing fee, an inmate must file an affidavit or declaration of previous filings that details all previous pro se actions and contains a certified copy of the inmate’s trust account statement. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE. ANN. § 14.004 (West 2017). On February 2, 2018, the clerk of this Court notified Appellant that the filing fee in this appeal is due. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5. Appellant was informed that failure to remit the filing fee on or before February 12, 2018, would result in the Court’s taking appropriate action, including dismissal of the case without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). The date for remitting the filing fee has passed, and Appellant has not paid the filing fee or submitted a declaration of inability to pay costs, an inmate trust account statement, or an affidavit regarding previous filings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1, see also TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. §§ 14.002(a), 14.004 (West 2017); In re Benjamin, No. 09-17-00396-CV, 2017 WL 4974632, at *1, n.1 (Tex. App.—Beaumont Nov. 2, 2017, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). Nor has Appellant otherwise responded to this Court’s notice. Because, after notice and an opportunity to cure, Appellant has neither paid the filing fee nor complied with Chapter 14, the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c); see also Ex parte Alvarado, No. 13-16-00514-CV, 2016 WL 6520179 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi Nov. 3, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op.). Opinion delivered February 14, 2018. Panel consisted of Neeley, J. and Bass, Retired J., Twelfth Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment. Worthen, C.J. and Hoyle, J., not participating.

(PUBLISH)

2 COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

FEBRUARY 14, 2018

MICHAEL A. KENNEDY, Appellant V. JAMES T. WORTHEN, BRIAN HOYLE, MARK A. CALHOON, ALLYSON A. MITCHELL, CITY OF PALESTINE POLICE DEPARTMENT, ANDERSON COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, TDCJ-ID DIRECTOR, TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AND BRANDI RAY, IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICAL CAPACITY, Appellees

Appeal from the 3rd District Court of Anderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. DCCV17-723-3) THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the appellate record, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that the appeal be dismissed, and that the decision be certified to the court below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Neeley, J. and Bass, Retired J., Twelfth Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment. Worthen, C.J. and Hoyle, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 14.002
Texas CP § 14.002(a)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Michael A. Kennedy v. James T. Worthen, Brian Hoyle, Mark A. Calhoon, Allyson A. Mitchell, City of Palestine Police Department, Anderson County Sheriff Department, TDCJ-ID Director, Texas Court of Criminal Appeals and Brandi Ray, in Their Individual and Offical Capacity, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-a-kennedy-v-james-t-worthen-brian-hoyle-mark-a-calhoon-texapp-2018.