Michael A. Haas v. Department of the Interior

873 F.2d 1451
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedMay 3, 1989
Docket88-3471
StatusUnpublished

This text of 873 F.2d 1451 (Michael A. Haas v. Department of the Interior) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michael A. Haas v. Department of the Interior, 873 F.2d 1451 (Fed. Cir. 1989).

Opinion

873 F.2d 1451

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Michael A. HAAS, Petitioner,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF the INTERIOR, Respondent.

No. 88-3471.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 3, 1989.
Rehearing Denied May 3, 1989.

Before FRIEDMAN, RICH and MAYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

DECISION

The decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, Docket No. AT07528810012 (May 13, 1988), dismissing the appeal of Michael Haas as untimely filed, is affirmed.

OPINION

Haas did not present evidence of the alleged psychological disorder to the Administrative Judge. The Board will not consider evidence for the first time on a petition for review, absent a showing that it was unavailable before the record was closed despite the party's due diligence. 5 C.F.R. Sec. 1201.115 (1988); see also Keely v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 760 F.2d 246, 249 (Fed.Cir.1985). Haas made no showing that evidence of his disorder was not available at the initial hearing. The Administrative Judge did not abuse his discretion in rejecting Haas' request for a waiver of the timeliness requirement, and it was appropriate to dismiss the appeal as untimely filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin D. Keely v. Merit Systems Protection Board
760 F.2d 246 (Federal Circuit, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
873 F.2d 1451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-a-haas-v-department-of-the-interior-cafc-1989.