Michael A. Etienne, Jr. v. Mary Estime Irvin

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 21, 2026·No. 3D2025-0008·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed January 21, 2026.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D25-0008

Lower Tribunal No. 20-7239-CA-01

Michael A. Etienne Jr.,

Appellant,

vs.

Mary Estime Irvin,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Charles Kenneth Johnson, Judge.

Michael A. Etienne, Jr., in proper person.

Keystone Law Firm, P.A., and Eliezer S. Poupko and Frank Wolland, for appellee.

Before SCALES, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“In appellate proceedings the decision of a trial court has the presumption of correctness and the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate error ....... Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Michael A. Etienne, Jr. v. Mary Estime Irvin, (Fla. Ct. App. 2026).

Michael A. Etienne, Jr. v. Mary Estime Irvin (Michael A. Etienne, Jr. v. Mary Estime Irvin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)