Michael A. Etienne, Jr. v. Mary Estime Irvin
This text of Michael A. Etienne, Jr. v. Mary Estime Irvin (Michael A. Etienne, Jr. v. Mary Estime Irvin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed January 21, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 3D25-0008 Lower Tribunal No. 20-7239-CA-01
Michael A. Etienne Jr., Appellant,
vs.
Mary Estime Irvin, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Charles Kenneth Johnson, Judge.
Michael A. Etienne, Jr., in proper person.
Keystone Law Firm, P.A., and Eliezer S. Poupko and Frank Wolland, for appellee.
Before SCALES, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d
1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“In appellate proceedings the decision of a trial
court has the presumption of correctness and the burden is on the
appellant to demonstrate error ....... Without a record of the trial
proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying
factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not
supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michael A. Etienne, Jr. v. Mary Estime Irvin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-a-etienne-jr-v-mary-estime-irvin-fladistctapp-2026.