Miceli v. Reily

54 A.D.2d 754, 387 N.Y.S.2d 707, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14411
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 25, 1976·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action inter alia to recover possession of real property, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered July 12, 1976, which, inter alia, denied the branch of her motion which sought to renew her application to compel defendants’ attorney to appear at an examination before trial as a witness. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. We previously held that an attorney’s verification of a pleading does not subject him to examination before trial as a witness (Miceli v Riley, 51 AD2d 972). Plaintiff renews her motion herein for such examination and for other relief, alleging new facts, but these new facts do not warrant the relief sought. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Margett, Rabin and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miceli v. Reily, 54 A.D.2d 754, 387 N.Y.S.2d 707, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14411 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

54 A.D.2d 754 (Miceli v. Reily) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miceli v. Reilly
57 A.D.2d 588 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)