Miceli v. Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co.
This text of 193 So. 3d 12 (Miceli v. Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Because the appellants have not preserved the claim of error for review, we affirm the non-final order on appeal, which determines that the motion to quash service of process was moot. However, before the trial court rules on the pending motion to quash re-service of process, it [13]*13must determine the validity of the original service of process from 2014. See Vidal v. SunTrust Bank, 41 So.3d 401, 404 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (“The validity of the original service must first be determined before the trial court can rule on the pending motion [to quash the second service].”).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
193 So. 3d 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miceli-v-bank-of-new-york-mellon-trust-co-fladistctapp-2016.