Miceli v. Atlas Assurance
225 A.D. 723
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1928·Published
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Taylor, J., who dissents on the law and votes for reversal on the ground that there is nothing in the record to show that defendant waived, or was estopped from relying upon, the twelve months’ limitation period. Present — Hubbs, P. J., Clark, Sears, Taylor and Sawyer, JJ. [130 Misc. 52.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miceli v. Atlas Assurance, 225 A.D. 723 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).
225 A.D. 723 (Miceli v. Atlas Assurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miceli v. Atlas Assurance Co. of London
130 Misc. 52 (New York Supreme Court, 1927)