Micari v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Micari v. City of New York

45 A.D.3d 821, 845 N.Y.S.2d 747

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 27, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 45 A.D.3d 821 (Micari v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Micari v. City of New York, 45 A.D.3d 821, 845 N.Y.S.2d 747 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Solomon, J.), dated June 9, 2006, which granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff made a prima facie showing of his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]), and the defendant failed to raise any issue of fact in opposition thereto. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability. Crane, J.P., Goldstein, Florio and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Solomon, J.), dated June 9, 2006, which granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff made a prima facie showing of his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]), and the defendant failed to raise any issue of fact in opposition thereto. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability. Crane, J.P., Goldstein, Florio and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 A.D.3d 821, 845 N.Y.S.2d 747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/micari-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack