Micarelli v. Regal Apparel Ltd.

52 A.D.2d 524, 381 N.Y.S.2d 511, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12053
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 1, 1976
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 52 A.D.2d 524 (Micarelli v. Regal Apparel Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Micarelli v. Regal Apparel Ltd., 52 A.D.2d 524, 381 N.Y.S.2d 511, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12053 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

Order entered in the Supreme Court, New York County, on December 3, 1975; granting defendant’s motion to vacate a default judgment, unanimously affirmed, with $40 costs and disbursements of this appeal to respondent. In this action to recover commissions, plaintiff served a summons with notice upon the Secretary of State, pursuant to CPLR 311 (subd 1) and subdivision (b) of section 306 of the Business Corporation Law. Due to a staff error, the summons was not mailed to the defendant. Contrary to defendant’s assertions, Special Term reached the right result for the right reason. Service of process was complete when the Secretary of State was served. (Cascione v Acme Equip. Corp., 23 AD2d 49.) The court, therefore, acquired jurisdiction even though the summons was not forwarded to the defendant. (National Mfg. Corp. v Buffalo Metal Container Corp., 204 Mise 269; 1 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 311.09; see, also, Mullane v Central Hanover Trust Co., 339 US 306, 314.) Defendant’s right of due process was not violated since it was afforded an opportunity to vacate the default upon the showing of a meritorious defense. (See Wakerman Leather Co. v Foster Sportswear Co., 27 AD2d 767.) We find no abuse of discretion by the court below. The affidavit of merits was adequate. The default was clearly excusable and the defendant is entitled to its day in court. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Capozzoli, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bokum v. BUFNY II Assoc., L.P.
2025 NY Slip Op 03013 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Pryor v. Witter
96 A.D.3d 572 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Smith v. Giuffre Hyundai, Ltd.
60 A.D.3d 1040 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
BRIGGS AVENUE v. Insurance Corp. of Hannover
516 F.3d 42 (Second Circuit, 2008)
Montoya v. Richmond County Ambulance Service, Inc.
30 A.D.3d 385 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Topliff v. CHICAGO INSURANCE COMPANY
122 P.3d 922 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2005)
Spearman v. Atreet Corp.
238 A.D.2d 194 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Baker v. Latham Sparrowbush Associates
808 F. Supp. 981 (S.D. New York, 1992)
Associated Imports, Inc. v. Leon Amiel Publisher, Inc.
168 A.D.2d 354 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Vazquez v. Sund Emba AB
152 A.D.2d 389 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Marine Midland Realty Credit Corp. v. Welbilt Corp.
145 A.D.2d 84 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
In Re Cohoes Industrial Terminal, Inc.
62 B.R. 369 (S.D. New York, 1986)
Augusta Lumber & Supply, Inc. v. Herbert H. Sabbeth Corp.
101 A.D.2d 846 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Royal Athletic Surfacing Co. v. Crossfield Products Corp.
120 Misc. 2d 184 (New York Supreme Court, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 A.D.2d 524, 381 N.Y.S.2d 511, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12053, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/micarelli-v-regal-apparel-ltd-nyappdiv-1976.