Micallef v. Board of Education of the Ossining Union Free School District

13 A.D.3d 455, 785 N.Y.S.2d 706, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15247

This text of 13 A.D.3d 455 (Micallef v. Board of Education of the Ossining Union Free School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Micallef v. Board of Education of the Ossining Union Free School District, 13 A.D.3d 455, 785 N.Y.S.2d 706, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15247 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

[456]*456Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of mandamus, to compel the Board of Education of the Ossining Union Free School District to file an affidavit stating that the petitioner is eligible for retroactive membership in the New York State Teachers’ Retirement System pursuant to Retirement and Social Security Law § 803.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

Preliminarily, we note that where, as here, the administrative agency was not required by law to conduct a hearing {see Retirement and Social Security Law § 803 [b] [3]), the proceeding should not have been transferred to this Court pursuant to CPLR 7804 (g) (see Matter of Capone v Board of Educ. of Lafayette Cent. School Dist., 266 AD2d 879 [1999]). Nevertheless, we consider the merits in the interest of judicial economy (see id.; Matter of Moulden v Coughlin, 210 AD2d 997 [1994]; Matter of CVS Discount Liq. v New York State Liq. Auth., 207 AD2d 891, 892 [1994]; Matter of Dubb Enters. v New York State Liq. Auth., 187 AD2d 831, 832 [1992]).

At the time she first became eligible to join the New York State Teachers’ Retirement System (hereinafter the NYSTRS), the petitioner participated in a procedure that a reasonable person would recognize as a request to join the NYSTRS (see Retirement and Social Security Law § 803 [b] [3] [iii]; Matter of Clark v Board of Educ. for Kingston City School Dist., 90 NY2d 662 [1997]; Matter of Sadoff v Ithaca City School Dist., 246 AD2d 861, 863 [1998]; Matter of Lovett v Manhasset Pub. Schools, 245 AD2d 455 [1997]; Matter of Goldstein v Jericho Union Free School Dist., 245 AD2d 373 [1997]; cf. Matter of Tamulinas v Board of Educ. of Jericho Union Free School Dist., 279 AD2d 527 [2001]). S. Miller, J.P., Krausman, Mastro and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scanlan v. Buffalo Public School System
687 N.E.2d 1334 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)
Dubb Enterprises, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority
187 A.D.2d 831 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
CVS Discount Liquor, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority
207 A.D.2d 891 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Moulden v. Coughlin
210 A.D.2d 997 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Goldstein v. Jericho Union Free School District
245 A.D.2d 373 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Lovett v. Manhasset Public Schools
245 A.D.2d 455 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Sadoff v. Ithaca City School District
246 A.D.2d 861 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Capone v. Board of Education of Lafayette Central School District
266 A.D.2d 879 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Tamulinas v. Board of Education
279 A.D.2d 527 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 A.D.3d 455, 785 N.Y.S.2d 706, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/micallef-v-board-of-education-of-the-ossining-union-free-school-district-nyappdiv-2004.