Micale v. State

296 So. 2d 648, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7041
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 26, 1974
DocketNo. 72-982
StatusPublished

This text of 296 So. 2d 648 (Micale v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Micale v. State, 296 So. 2d 648, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7041 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The law is clear that legal questions, except those relating to jurisdiction, cannot be preserved upon a guilty plea. State v. Ashby, Fla.1971, 245 So.2d 225; Tillman v. State, Fla.App.2d, 1973, 287 So.2d 693; Monge v. State, Fla.App. 3d, 1973, 286 So.2d 34; Ward v. State, Fla.App. 1st, 1970, 236 So.2d 187.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., GRIMES, J., and SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ward v. State
236 So. 2d 187 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Tillman v. State
287 So. 2d 693 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
State v. Ashby
245 So. 2d 225 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)
Monge v. State
286 So. 2d 34 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
296 So. 2d 648, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7041, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/micale-v-state-fladistctapp-1974.