Micah Spanutius v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 30, 2010·No. 13-10-00052-CR·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-10-00052-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

MICAH SPANUTIUS, Appellant, v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 347th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Benavides Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Micah Spanutius, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to withdraw his appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to withdraw the appeal and pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a), dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be

entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 30th day of December, 2010.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Micah Spanutius v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Micah Spanutius v. State (Micah Spanutius v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.