Micah Spanutius v. State
Opinion
NUMBER 13-10-00052-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
MICAH SPANUTIUS, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 347th District Court of Nueces County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Benavides Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Micah Spanutius, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to
withdraw his appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it. See TEX. R. APP. P.
42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to withdraw the
appeal and pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a), dismiss the appeal.
Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 30th day of December, 2010.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Micah Spanutius v. State (Micah Spanutius v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.