Miao v. Caie Foods Partnership, Ltd.

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 kee AlHUAMIAO, et al., Case No. 3:22-CV-00463-ART-CLB 5 Plaintiffs, | ORDER SUA SPONTE EXTENDING TIM 6 y TO FILE SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL

7 CAIE FOODS PARTNERSHIP, LTD., et 3 al., Defendants. 9 10 On July 31, 2024, the Court granted Defense Counsel's motion to withdraw as 11 counsel and ordered Defendants Caie Foods Partnership, Ltd. and Caie Foods 12 | Production, LLC (collectively “Defendants”) to file a substitution of counsel on or before 13 | August 30, 2024. (ECF No. 57.) To date, a substitution of counsel has not been filed. 14 Defendants are again advised that a corporation and other unincorporated 15 | associations may only appear in federal court through an attorney. United States v. High 16 | Country Broadcasting Co., Inc., 3 F.3d 1244 (9th Cir. 1993); Licht v. America West 17 | Airlines, 40 F.3d 1058 (9th Cir. 1994). 18 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants shall have one final extension of time to October 3, 2024, to file a substitution of counsel. If an appearance has not been 20 entered by October 3, 2024, the Court will enter a Report and Recommendation a1 recommending that Defendants’ answer, (ECF No. 25), be stricken and a default be 22 | entered against Defendants by reason of failure to “otherwise defend” this action. Fed. R. 23| Civ. P. 55(a). 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 DATED: September 3, 2024 26 »

28 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE