Mian v. General Manager, Baltimore-Washington Manheim Auction

Fourth Circuit

Mian v. General Manager, Baltimore-Washington Manheim Auction

645 F. App'x 233

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 13, 2016

DocketNo. 15-2261

StatusPublished

This text of 645 F. App'x 233 (Mian v. General Manager, Baltimore-Washington Manheim Auction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mian v. General Manager, Baltimore-Washington Manheim Auction, 645 F. App'x 233 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mohammad A. Mian appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mian v. Gen. Manager, No. 8:14-cv-02534-TDC (D.Md. May 22, 2015; Oct. 7, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mohammad A. Mian appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mian v. Gen. Manager, No. 8:14-cv-02534-TDC (D.Md. May 22, 2015; Oct. 7, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

645 F. App'x 233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mian-v-general-manager-baltimore-washington-manheim-auction-ca4-2016.