Miami & Northern Realty Corp. v. Barnett National Bank

Supreme Court of Florida

Miami & Northern Realty Corp. v. Barnett National Bank

150 So. 804, 112 Fla. 745, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2345

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 16, 1933·Published

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

This cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record and the briefs and oral argument of counsel, all of which have been duly considered, the Court is of the opinion that there is no reversible error in the orders appealed from. It is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the orders appealed from in this cause be and they are hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam.

This cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record and the briefs and oral argument of counsel, all of which have been duly considered, the Court is of the opinion that there is no reversible error in the orders appealed from. It is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the orders appealed from in this cause be and they are hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Miami & Northern Realty Corp. v. Barnett National Bank, 150 So. 804, 112 Fla. 745, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2345 (Fla. 1933).

Pincite

150 So. 804 (Miami & Northern Realty Corp. v. Barnett National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.